Twitter vs.. Newspapers
ne Twitter is great: you can with yourself and follow other people or institutions. Anything that gets these people / institutions, as submitted by you is displayed on its home page: Who has what and when eaten, and the latest aircraft crashes and network news world. All highly disordered at a glance.
"What interests me, what Stephen Fry had dinner?" I hear my housemates moan. And that's the sticking point. As an inveterate talker Internet by Stephen Fry is interested in me burning if he has once eaten fish for dinner or something else. "I WANT TO KNOW IT!" is the motto. No matter how trivial or silly Twitter "news" that sound so-called "tweets" as well. Anyone is interested. And if Stephen Fry would write that he now goes to the bathroom. Yes! I would read it and it interested me.
drives the forward Twitter: interest. Interest in seemingly uninteresting. And his Let's be honest: 90% of our daily conversation and communication is neither unique nor original nor unique, much less informative or even interesting, "Good morning", "Good day", "How are you?", "Have you so I had a stupid customers today ..? " That's actually human communication: you talk concerted, repeated phrases over and over again through. Only a tiny part of what is said is original or new. Much less of it informative and even less of it interesting.
Not even the gossip columns of the image * * öchöwürg are interesting. But many people buy them are "news" to read. As a human you're just interested not only in pure new information. You look out for themselves what is of interest to you. Man entsheidet itself yes, even with the purchase of an image you meet that decision. (The name of the dirt sheet, I will not use again. NEVER AGAIN!)
Why all think that the newspapers mention the rank expires? That's a very different kind of communication! I buy newspapers. Since there is no "Hi, I had this morning egg with soy sauce and toast. The best I ever had for breakfast." No. A newspaper to buy, you use / read it and throws it away. Twitter could never sink to that level ..
Twitter is part of the so-called Web2.0. That is so because it consists only of people who communicate in any manner and maintain because of their communication websites running and make way to be extremely interesting:
Facebook, Flickr knows who-whom - they are looking for browsing someone and them by means of his private life such as photographs.
Delicious - visit Intetnetseiten that other people visit often, and even to bookmark for later to visit again.
Actually, even reviews of videos on Youtube communication: "Look at that, because there are 100 000 people great." That is a reason! People are pack animals, penguins! Always on my side is the motto.
So many websites continue to develop for their users. That lengthens the Computr not smart, has got around. "All we have to do alone," says to a vast number of Internet users and creates its own bookmarks bearing world.
why Twitter can replace even a newspaper. Twitter is faster, more accurate, free and more human than newspapers. Twitter includes ONLY a human-to-human communication, while fake newspapers ONLY a God-to-human communication - they "know" everything important will get down to us to inform you very neutral. It's easier to say than man: "Oh What I wrote was in fact very different.." Although newspapers can also provide clear, but are never able to reach all readers of Klarzustellenden because not every reader reads every article in a newspaper attention. It's just too much. Twitter, with its 140-character entries in brief in the matter. Meaningless messages will be scanned as soon as reasonably free and meaningful. Articles and reports in newspapers since a long time to read all pleadings must be able to evaluate them.
Only my opinion the evening.
Antonia
0 comments:
Post a Comment